Rice finding 2134

Source evidence and comparison details for the Rice profile.

A.A. et al. 2008

Market rice (type not separated) · Inorganic arsenic (iAs) · 9 market rice samples (788 white) in the database, excluding field survey samples; field survey n per Table 3.5; speciation n=45.

Selected finding and reference

60–140 µg/kg (range)Range.

9 market rice samples (788 white) in the database, excluding field survey samples; field survey n per Table 3.5; speciation n=45. Basis: unspecified (market rice as purchased; Aberdeen database tables state no dry/fresh basis).

No non-detects in this row; source reports summary values only.

HMI baseline position

Limited data: The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference. Missing evidence never means low contamination.

The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference.

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

No admitted reference

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

Collection period

Collection date unreported

No year-by-year sample register is reconstructed from this summary.

Geographic scope

purchased UK, origin USA

Purchase or reporting market; growing origin not identified.

Sampling, analysis and reporting limits

Total arsenic per Williams et al. procedures (not described in this report) with NIST 1568a rice flour CRM; speciation by HPLC-ICP-MS after TFA extraction (Figure 3.4 caption; inorganic = arsenate + arsenite).

No non-detects in this row; source reports summary values only.

Shared samples and study overlap

Subgroup rows, statistics of the same subgroup and the study total share samples; they are not independent results.

Each table row describes a food/analyte result. Repeated rows do not add independent samples or datasets. No cross-study trend is calculated in this comparison mode.

Reported values, conversion and source locator
Source statisticOriginal resultDisplayed unit conversion
rangeminimum 0.06; maximum 0.14mg/kg x 1000

Table 3.7, p.21.

No moisture, cooking-yield or species conversion is applied to the original finding above. Any basis conversion used for its HMI comparison is stated separately with the numerical target.

Open the primary publication · HMI source record