Rice finding 2009

Source evidence and comparison details for the Rice profile.

European 2014

Brown rice · Inorganic arsenic (iAs) · 94 rice samples with reported iAs (of 2211 rice samples in FoodEx 'Rice'; the rest had tAs only).

Selected finding and reference

250 µg/kg (95th percentile)95th percentile.

94 rice samples with reported iAs (of 2211 rice samples in FoodEx 'Rice'; the rest had tAs only). Basis: whole weight (as reported to EFSA; dry-matter results converted to whole weight using moisture data); raw rice as sold/sampled.

2% left-censored; LB substitution. This finding is the LB 95th percentile.

HMI baseline position

Limited data: The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference. Missing evidence never means low contamination.

The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference.

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

No admitted reference

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

Collection period

2003–2012

No year-by-year sample register is reconstructed from this summary.

Geographic scope

Rice, brown

Rice variety or type within one study.

Sampling, analysis and reporting limits

Heterogeneous member-state methods; for iAs the most reported detection method was ICP-MS (66.8%); 97 rice samples gave iAs as sum of As(III)+As(V).

2% left-censored; LB substitution. This finding is the LB 95th percentile.

Shared samples and study overlap

Subgroup rows, statistics of the same subgroup and the study total share samples; they are not independent results.

Each table row describes a food/analyte result. Repeated rows do not add independent samples or datasets. No cross-study trend is calculated in this comparison mode.

Reported values, conversion and source locator
Source statisticOriginal resultDisplayed unit conversion
95th percentileRice, brown 94 2 150.7 151.9 153.1 250.0 250.0 250.0none

Table 3, 95th percentile columns; p.17.

No moisture, cooking-yield or species conversion is applied to the original finding above. Any basis conversion used for its HMI comparison is stated separately with the numerical target.

Open the primary publication · HMI source record